EVE Search - Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.22 18:30:00 - [1] I will contribute absolutly nothing to this thread. Me: Look Ma, there's a dead horse right here called "Level 4 Missions in High Sec". I Think I'll just stick this thread ups it's ass and beat it dead some more. Is that OK Ma? Ma: Sounds good son. You just be home for dinner. Ya hear? --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 03:42:00 - [2] Originally by: Kahega Amielden Originally by: Terail Zoqial lvl 4 missions are tedious as hell, that is the punishment for the isk. Risk vs reward is pants, sheesh, next you'll be nattering on about the golden ratio All the more reason to encourage people to do other things. Everyone has more fun that way. I am not giving you a hard time here. But how do you know what is fun for everyone in game? You know what my idea of fun is? My idea of fun is finding a mission runner in a level 4 mission. A mission runner in a pimped out Battleship (faction/T2, I don't care). A mission runner who has not a clue on how aggression works in High Sec. A mission runner who will stay in that mission while I get my pimped out mission runner killing ship. A mission runner who will stay there and let me kill him and salvage his wreak and loot his faction mods. Me, I had fun. Him, not so much. I say let the mission runners have their level 4 missions in High Sec. I don't have a problem with that. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 03:51:00 - [3] Edited by: Traidor Disloyal on 26/08/2008 03:51:10 Originally by: Dave Davies Originally by: Traidor Disloyal I am not giving you a hard time here. But how do you know what is fun for everyone in game? You know what my idea of fun is? My idea of fun is finding a mission runner in a level 4 mission. A mission runner in a pimped out Battleship (faction/T2, I don't care). A mission runner who has not a clue on how aggression works in High Sec. A mission runner who will stay in that mission while I get my pimped out mission runner killing ship. A mission runner who will stay there and let me kill him and salvage his wreak and loot his faction mods. Me, I had fun. Him, not so much. I say let the mission runners have their level 4 missions in High Sec. I don't have a problem with that. Subsidized, low- risk/ high value piracy in high sec is no better than subsidized, low- risk/ high value grinding in high sec. Nerf plz. Now you're taking away my fun. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 15:31:00 - [4] Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette The reason for posting on the forums is to bring to CCP's attention that there might be a problem in the game. That doesn't mean there always is a problem, but it gets CCP's attention and might get them to check it out for themselves. That's why a long thread like this is important for us advocating this change. It brings attention. Game needs more chocolate cake and butter pecan ice cream. The ice cream needs chocolate topping on it. I prefer the hardshell kind. CCP, get it done. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 17:17:00 - [5] Bring back July 2003. It'll fix everything. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 17:28:00 - [6] Originally by: Ruze Originally by: Traidor Disloyal Bring back July 2003. It'll fix everything. God help us all. That would be a shock. At least you guys would get rid of me. I had no interest in the game back then. It wasn't that bad. Low sec and 0.0 was a lot easier to get into. I never got a chance to do what was called "ninja mining" out in 0.0. Stuff was very expensive back then. Best ship I had was a Rupture and boy did it have a god awful fit on it when I logged in my 2003 character back in around August 2006. The little guy was actually in 0.0 space. But, if CCP did do a July 2003 it would shut up so many people (yes, mostly due to shock) about nerf this, nerf that. And, man, would it be hilarious. Could you imagine, Jita a free fire zone? Just the thought tingles my toes. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 17:38:00 - [7] Originally by: Ruze But the lack of content available in 2003? I mean, in July, did they even have agents at all? No thanks. They were just starting to get the bugs out when I left. I think all they had were level 2 agents back then. I got most of my isk rating in low sec and helping to mine out in 0.0. I had enough to afford a Rupture, a Stabber, and a hauler that I found in different places on the map. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.26 17:46:00 - [8] Originally by: Kahega Amielden Edited by: Kahega Amielden on 26/08/2008 17:42:04 Quote: They were just starting to get the bugs out when I left. I think all they had were level 2 agents back then. I got most of my isk rating in low sec and helping to mine out in 0.0. I had enough to afford a Rupture, a Stabber, and a hauler that I found in different places on the map. Wow, the game must have sucked back then. I mean, you couldn't even make enough ISK to replace battleship losses within 2 hours without having to risk your ship to pirate gankers. Had to be careful with those dang Rifters too. Like gold,man, gold. --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot
Traidor Disloyal I Am Not A Lawyer	Posted - 2008.08.27 19:26:00 - [9] Originally by: Qob Hey, if we are talking about Risk vs Reward, I suggest we nerf the Traders. They are totally safe, snug in their hangers. I agree. Little risk, lot of reward. Two thumbs up --------------------------------------------- Love is having a second account with a cov ops pilot

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.